Search
(Supports wildcard *)Artist
- ? lustylamb 1413
General
- ? 2boys 335404
- ? aftercare 413
- ? anal 711945
- ? anal sex 320368
- ? anthro 1909552
- ? anthro on anthro 104008
- ? begging 8053
- ? canine 684965
- ? chastity 11036
- ? collar 271202
- ? duo 858450
- ? fellatio 411814
- ? furry 643444
- ? gay 398092
- ? good boy 2789
- ? handjob 191210
- ? knot 174958
- ? male 2708945
- ? male only 851466
- ? mammal 1558999
- ? oral 562232
- ? paw mitts 58
- ? paws 152162
- ? penetration 826017
- ? petplay 11981
- ? petting 2033
- ? precum 225947
- ? puppyplay 1364
- ? roleplay 7013
- ? sex 1689828
- ? teasing 38757
- ? wholesome 20177
- ? yaoi 395099
Meta
- ? conditional dnp 14579
- ? dialogue 356592
- ? partially colored 6966
- ? sketch 119345
- ? text 861762
- ? watermark 146250
Cum on this
-
You can cum every 24 hours.
Explanation here and top list here.
Statistics
- Id: 3179659
-
Posted: 2019-04-17 00:40:12
by bot - Size: 1280x960
- Source: www.furaffinity.net/user/lustylamb/
- Rating: Explicit
- Score: 41 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
1
Posted on 2019-04-18 10:27:51 Score: 16 (vote Up) ( Report comment )
So naturally, I was curious about some other subjective tags, like 'wholesome'. I thought that could be pretty subjective too. This post is one of the posts that came up as having a 'wholesome' tag.
I honestly wasn't expecting much, as another post that had a 'wholesome' tag was very vague, and objectively wouldn't really be considered 'wholesome'. While sure, it could be wholesome, the image was extremely vague and unobvious as to why the artist and/or the poster would think it was 'wholesome'.
However, after reading through this one, this image pales the other one in comparison.
If there was any picture on here, or Gelbooru, or Paheal, that was definitely an image that should be tagged as 'wholesome', it would be this image.
Posted on 2020-12-03 08:21:20 Score: 3 (vote Up) ( Report comment )