1futa 1girl1futa 1girls after_fellatio after_oral age_difference big_penis breasts brown_hair clothed cum cum_in_mouth cum_on_tongue cum_string cum_trail cumdrip daughter duo earrings english english_text fellatio female forced forced_oral futa_focus futa_on_female futanari glory_hole hair_over_one_eye huge_cock human incest intersex laurie_barrett long_hair medial_ring mother mother_and_daughter nose_hook nose_piercing open_mouth panties pants_down parent parent_and_child penis penis_out piercing public_use restrained smile solo_focus sparrow_(artist) speech_bubble standing t-shirt text thong tip_jar tongue_forced_out tongue_out tongue_piercing ursula_barrett veins veiny_penis

16 comments (0 hidden)

GuyWithHorsecock >> #229233
Posted on 2014-01-19 02:10:39 Score: 17 (vote Up) ( Report comment )
I tagged this futa_on_futa because her mother is a futanari too, as you can see here:
www.hentai-foundry.com/pi...116862/Welcome-Home-Again

Miss_Vulf >> #229235
Posted on 2014-01-19 02:17:54 Score: 39 (vote Up) ( Report comment )
Tag What You See, Not What You Know (TWYSNWYK)
Tags exist for ease of searching, not for providing information about characters. It doesn't matter if a character is a futa or not if it isn't visible in the image itself.

GuyWithHorsecock >> #229236
Posted on 2014-01-19 02:21:36 Score: 18 (vote Up) ( Report comment )
Are you sure?
Maybe it adds to someone's pleasure knowing that she's futa?

And why would I not tag it, is the tag wrong like that?
Someone searches for futa on futa and sees this, so he knows the other character is one and enjoys it.

And I also provided a link to those curious to how I know it, I don't see anything wrong with that.

Miss_Vulf >> #229238
Posted on 2014-01-19 02:27:29 Score: 16 (vote Up) ( Report comment )
Let me try to explain this...
If a character is a futa in some images, but not in others, should all the images of that character be tagged futa?

And the "Not What You Know" part of TWYSNWYK is that using outside sources to tag stuff ist verboten. Doesn't matter what the artist or other images say, all that matters to a post's tags is the content of that post alone.

GuyWithHorsecock >> #229239
Posted on 2014-01-19 02:30:22 Score: 2 (vote Up) ( Report comment )
Yes but the tag doesn't harm anyone, now does it.
I mean I get what you're saying but I also don't see the problem with providing additional information?

Miss_Vulf >> #229241
Posted on 2014-01-19 02:32:57 Score: 9 (vote Up) ( Report comment )
Additional information is fine. It's just nicer if that information stays out of the tags.

naughty-jess >> #229242
Posted on 2014-01-19 02:33:47 Score: 10 (vote Up) ( Report comment )
Does it really need this much of a discussion

aria1990 >> #229243
Posted on 2014-01-19 02:35:17 Score: 19 (vote Up) ( Report comment )
Yes because because there are many pics that are incredibly missed tagged. You should tag ONLY what you see in the pic.

Gloom >> #229245
Posted on 2014-01-19 02:36:57 Score: 3 (vote Up) ( Report comment )
Let's continue this in the forum.
forum #3193

Anonymous >> #234237
Posted on 2014-02-06 22:28:32 Score: -7 (vote Up) ( Report comment )
Just tag both. .-.
I don't see what the problem is.

1 2 > >>