AnonymousScorpio
04/23/17 03:30PM
BendyCindy said:
This would lead to a variable amount of cum. Since guys (I assume in this scenario?) would cum as much as they peed, then their volume of cum would depend on how much liquid was waiting in their excretory system. This leads to a wider range of cum volumes: an example being if some guy got done with a long gaming session in which he drank a lot of soda and really had to go, he would cum excessively more than if he had already gone before going to bed with his lover.

That said, I'd bring those 36-packs of bottled water to bed with me every time i had a guy over, and have my washing machine ready for the morning.


love that response
blackarachnia_rocks
04/23/17 03:38PM
Omg, if that were real, I'd be able to fulfill one of my fantasies and probably actually be able to visibly distend my stomach after sucking my own cock and drinking all the cum. o.o
AnonymousScorpio
04/23/17 03:42PM
....
dr8rd
04/23/17 03:54PM
I assume the basic premise is that one would be able to cum a theoretical maximum amount broadly equal to the theoretical maximum amount one can pee. I somehow doubt the amount of cum is supposed to match the exact amount of urine present (what would happen to the cum after you'd been for a piss, for example?). Therefore:

Condoms would need to be reinforced, or massively increased in size. Or else just go over to use modelling balloons.

Testicles would be massively more swollen; they'd have to hold 1-2 pints of spunk. Suddenly men are no longer able to participate in most Olympic events (especially the hurdles)...

Although it makes a certain amount of sense to increase volume of sperm from a reproductive/evolutionary perspective, wombs would also have to increase in size to accommodate it; pot-bellied women would become the norm and presumably the (purely biologically-inspired) standard of beauty.

It would presumably also be genuinely possible to drown any woman attempting to swallow the whole load (it would almost be like deepthroating a yard of ale), which would presumably lead to a certain disturbing subset of simulated 'cum-drowning' porn.

Stocks in tissue companies would skyrocket, as well as those who sell rubber bedsheets.

Spacehoppers would likely be reconsidered as a hatecrime.
Kumquat
04/23/17 04:02PM
Only now, am I remembering that scene where Austin Powers is being restored from cryogenical freezing, more specifically, when he takes forever to empty his bladder... Yeah. ~
bipface
04/23/17 04:22PM
dr8rd said:
Testicles would be massively more swollen; they'd have to hold 1-2 pints of spunk.

not quite; semen isn't stored there, only sperm cells

contrary to typical hentai-anatomy
bipface
04/23/17 04:27PM
blackarachnia_rocks said:
Omg, if that were real, I'd be able to fulfill one of my fantasies and probably actually be able to visibly distend my stomach after sucking my own cock and drinking all the cum. o.o

taking advantage of that hentai-anatomy again where semen is stored in a compressed state before it's ejaculated
(otherwise there'd be no net gain in volume by drinking it)
dr8rd
04/23/17 04:35PM
bipface said:
dr8rd said:
Testicles would be massively more swollen; they'd have to hold 1-2 pints of spunk.

not quite; semen isn't stored there, only sperm cells

contrary to typical hentai-anatomy


You do realise that sperm is part of what makes up semen, right? Therefore, if you increase the amount of cum, you're increasing the amount of sperm that has to be produced. Unless you want watery sperm-free seminal fluid, with drastically reduced virility levels.
Jade_Non
04/23/17 05:54PM
What a weird topic. Yet it's so smart, well as smart as you can be for people on a lewd site. No offense, I am one after all
bipface
04/23/17 06:31PM
dr8rd said:
You do realise that sperm is part of what makes up semen, right? Therefore, if you increase the amount of cum, you're increasing the amount of sperm that has to be produced. Unless you want watery sperm-free seminal fluid, with drastically reduced virility levels.

You do realise that semen is composed of approximately 2% to 5% sperm cells, right?
that's why it looks pretty much the same after a vasectomy

~95% of semen's ingredients come from the seminal vesicles and prostate

that's not to say there wouldn't be some increase in testicle size if the sperm ratio is to be maintained
Miss_Vulf
04/23/17 11:42PM
math
a human bladder can hold about 600mL of urine, but the urge to pee usually occurs around the 150-200mL mark

in reality an average ejaculation is about 3.5mL and contains about 0.175mL of sperm cells
in this hypothetical scenario an average ejaculation would be 150-200mL and contain about 7.5-10mL of sperm cells

all other things being equal, the size of the testicles would have to increase by about 40-50 times to accommodate this
The_Hex_Maniac
04/23/17 11:55PM
According to the various pictures of me, I seem to lactate as much as I...Well, yeah...
dr8rd
04/24/17 01:58AM
bipface said:
You do realise that semen is composed of approximately 2% to 5% sperm cells, right?
that's why it looks pretty much the same after a vasectomy

~95% of semen's ingredients come from the seminal vesicles and prostate

that's not to say there wouldn't be some increase in testicle size if the sperm ratio is to be maintained


I don't think you quite understood my point. If you're increasing total production of semen, everything involved with it is going to increase by exactly the same ratio. Like Miss_Vulf said, something in the magnitude of 40-50 times. That applies to the testes and the seminal vesicles (and presumably the prostate come to that, so noone will be sitting down anytime soon either).

Which is all before considering that the testes are larger than the prostate and seminal vesicles to begin with (take a look at an anatomical diagram). That size ratio wouldn't change, they would simply all vastly outgrow their usual bodily locations.
bipface
04/24/17 06:29AM
dr8rd said:
I don't think you quite understood my point

well you've changed your point; look …
dr8rd said:
Testicles would be massively more swollen; they'd have to hold 1-2 pints of spunk.

since we've established normal testes hold only a tiny volume of sperm, even if you scale that up "40-50" times it's still a pretty tiny volume, not "1-2 pints" like you suggested.
that's all i'm trying to say
BendyCindy
04/24/17 10:48AM
bipface said:
dr8rd said:
I don't think you quite understood my point

well you've changed your point; look …
dr8rd said:
Testicles would be massively more swollen; they'd have to hold 1-2 pints of spunk.

since we've established normal testes hold only a tiny volume of sperm, even if you scale that up "40-50" times it's still a pretty tiny volume, not "1-2 pints" like you suggested.
that's all i'm trying to say



FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT!
kiss kiss kiss
<<<1 2 34>>>


Reply | Forum Index