Kielan wrote:
Loli is any porn which contains subjects who 'appear' to be to young for sex or to be posing nude,.

The law nor advertisers give any credence to the fictitious age given by authors, why? because you can say a girl is 13 even when she looks 9, but that does not change the fact that the person in the picture looks like a child, so they don't care one little bit what age the author gives the character, only thing that matters is if they "look"/appear like they are too young to have sex, a child is a child, a teenager isn't.

To sum up, what matters is the fictional age the character is, the law and advertisers only care how old a character looks, if they look like a child, it's loli.

cg_lover said:
already read it, but does that mean the models merely have to look grown up?

like for example they could be 14 in the original story but look like they're 28, because that's what i have found here

and something like that is acceptable, is that what the rules are telling me?