Mr_XXX
05/04/13 03:22PM
Offensive posts
So, as I was checking the recent comments list, I found this: rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=471993

Now, I understand if people like traps and bestiality, but to use it to insult other religions? Kielan once said that this is a library of porn, and I accept it, but I don't accept that some of the porn here offends things, such as that pic, which obviously offends Islam. So far, that's the only pic I saw that offends any religion, and from the looks of it, there are other pics that offend this religion.

My request? Simple: To delete all posts that offend things such as this. 'Course, it'll take a while, since there are quite a lotta posts, but still, this is a library, not a place for haters like the Ku Klux Klan. Would Kielan please answer my request?

Update: This post seems to be offensive as well: rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=1014302
Gloom
05/04/13 03:40PM
I agree
Any image that is designed to offend something shouldn't be created in the first place, let alone put on display, where it can offend many people and cause unnecessary hatred. Perhaps we as users should flag these offending images for deletion.
FapNinja
05/04/13 03:51PM
I saw a picture on this site once of Jesus fucking some sheep.
I think that should be deleted as well.
Mr_XXX
05/04/13 03:53PM
Exactly. I've already flagged those two I mentioned. Everyone, please flag such pictures. This is a library of porn, just like Kielan said, so let's keep as a true library.
sissyteen123
05/04/13 06:00PM
ditto, flagged. no need for images like that just to cause offence, might not be my religion but i still don't want to see it happen to others when i know how i would feel.
Blitzbrony
05/04/13 09:56PM
Heheh this is primely why I choose not to have a religion, but they offend you guys, so I agree they should be deleted ._.
Abigail
05/05/13 01:09AM
Slippery slope everyone. If you censor one thing, why not censor everything that offends someone. I'm sure plenty of people out there would look at this site and be offended by everything they see.
I agree they are offensive, but isn't that why we have the blacklist option so if we are offended we don't have to see it?
I'm also a religious person.
Gloom
05/05/13 01:33AM
Abigail said:
Slippery slope everyone. If you censor one thing, why not censor everything that offends someone. I'm sure plenty of people out there would look at this site and be offended by everything they see.
I agree they are offensive, but isn't that why we have the blacklist option so if we are offended we don't have to see it?
I'm also a religious person.

Any image has the potential to offend someone, but if you deleted every image that someone found offensive you would end up deleting everything. This is more about images that are designed to be offensive and designed to cause hatred, those are the ones that should be deleted. For everything else, the blacklist definitely helps.
Abigail
05/05/13 05:54AM
Gloom said:
Abigail said:
Slippery slope everyone. If you censor one thing, why not censor everything that offends someone. I'm sure plenty of people out there would look at this site and be offended by everything they see.
I agree they are offensive, but isn't that why we have the blacklist option so if we are offended we don't have to see it?
I'm also a religious person.

Any image has the potential to offend someone, but if you deleted every image that someone found offensive you would end up deleting everything. This is more about images that are designed to be offensive and designed to cause hatred, those are the ones that should be deleted. For everything else, the blacklist definitely helps.[/
Gloom said:
[quote]Abigail said:
Slippery slope everyone. If you censor one thing, why not censor everything that offends someone. I'm sure plenty of people out there would look at this site and be offended by everything they see.
I agree they are offensive, but isn't that why we have the blacklist option so if we are offended we don't have to see it?
I'm also a religious person.

Any image has the potential to offend someone, but if you deleted every image that someone found offensive you would end up deleting everything. This is more about images that are designed to be offensive and designed to cause hatred, those are the ones that should be deleted. For everything else, the blacklist definitely helps.


I can agree with deleting images created with the intent to offend people, but if a straight-blooded Christian came onto this sight, isn't there a good chance he might say all of the pictures here were created to offend him?
I'm just saying--who would be the judge of what was made specifically to offend and what wasn't?
Blitzbrony
05/05/13 06:22AM
The owners of the site have a say if it's reasonably offensive or not ._.
Abigail
05/05/13 07:04AM
Blitzbrony said:
The owners of the site have a say if it's reasonably offensive or not ._.


Which is fair, but if they say it's okay, as it currently appears to be now...
Who are we to say what is offensive? If the owners agreed, then they would have already deleted them--or will when they read this.
kakashi
05/05/13 08:19AM
Abigail said:
Blitzbrony said:
The owners of the site have a say if it's reasonably offensive or not ._.


Which is fair, but if they say it's okay, as it currently appears to be now...
Who are we to say what is offensive? If the owners agreed, then they would have already deleted them--or will when they read this.


Which is why the OP is bringing this topic up for discussion, to bring it to their attention. Basically asking us as members to help them in getting rid of such things.

But I agree with what everyone is saying, images made intentionally to spite people like that don't really have a use here. Besides, it's hardly considered porn anyway.
Gloom
05/05/13 08:25AM
Abigail said:
I can agree with deleting images created with the intent to offend people, but if a straight-blooded Christian came onto this sight, isn't there a good chance he might say all of the pictures here were created to offend him?
I'm just saying--who would be the judge of what was made specifically to offend and what wasn't?

That is a rather extreme example (and a little ridiculous as well). If someone believed that all pictures displayed here were made to offend them personally then a disliking to porn is their issue. But then you have to wonder why that person would be here at all?

Any user who knows enough about a particular race, religion, etc. can determine what would be deliberately offensive and can flag images accordingly. Also...
Blitzbrony said:
The owners of the site have a say if it's reasonably offensive or not ._.

I think the admins and moderators check flagged images to see if they should be deleted.
Blitzbrony
05/05/13 08:47AM
Which is why I said what I said ._.'
Mr_XXX
05/05/13 12:41PM
Abigail said:
Gloom said:
Abigail said:
Slippery slope everyone. If you censor one thing, why not censor everything that offends someone. I'm sure plenty of people out there would look at this site and be offended by everything they see.
I agree they are offensive, but isn't that why we have the blacklist option so if we are offended we don't have to see it?
I'm also a religious person.

Any image has the potential to offend someone, but if you deleted every image that someone found offensive you would end up deleting everything. This is more about images that are designed to be offensive and designed to cause hatred, those are the ones that should be deleted. For everything else, the blacklist definitely helps.[/
Gloom said:
[quote]Abigail said:
Slippery slope everyone. If you censor one thing, why not censor everything that offends someone. I'm sure plenty of people out there would look at this site and be offended by everything they see.
I agree they are offensive, but isn't that why we have the blacklist option so if we are offended we don't have to see it?
I'm also a religious person.

Any image has the potential to offend someone, but if you deleted every image that someone found offensive you would end up deleting everything. This is more about images that are designed to be offensive and designed to cause hatred, those are the ones that should be deleted. For everything else, the blacklist definitely helps.


I can agree with deleting images created with the intent to offend people, but if a straight-blooded Christian came onto this sight, isn't there a good chance he might say all of the pictures here were created to offend him?
I'm just saying--who would be the judge of what was made specifically to offend and what wasn't?


The owner of the picture will never admit that they made it with the intent to offend the thing in it, and of course, there are pictures here that are obviously made to be offensive, just like the ones I set up as examples. The blacklist option is to be used to block all kinds of porn we don't like, not to block what we deem as offensive. Also, are you sure you're not saying those things only because on
Abigail said:
Gloom said:
Abigail said:
Slippery slope everyone. If you censor one thing, why not censor everything that offends someone. I'm sure plenty of people out there would look at this site and be offended by everything they see.
I agree they are offensive, but isn't that why we have the blacklist option so if we are offended we don't have to see it?
I'm also a religious person.

Any image has the potential to offend someone, but if you deleted every image that someone found offensive you would end up deleting everything. This is more about images that are designed to be offensive and designed to cause hatred, those are the ones that should be deleted. For everything else, the blacklist definitely helps.[/
Gloom said:
[quote]Abigail said:
Slippery slope everyone. If you censor one thing, why not censor everything that offends someone. I'm sure plenty of people out there would look at this site and be offended by everything they see.
I agree they are offensive, but isn't that why we have the blacklist option so if we are offended we don't have to see it?
I'm also a religious person.

Any image has the potential to offend someone, but if you deleted every image that someone found offensive you would end up deleting everything. This is more about images that are designed to be offensive and designed to cause hatred, those are the ones that should be deleted. For everything else, the blacklist definitely helps.


I can agree with deleting images created with the intent to offend people, but if a straight-blooded Christian came onto this sight, isn't there a good chance he might say all of the pictures here were created to offend him?
I'm just saying--who would be the judge of what was made specifically to offend and what wasn't?


The owner of the picture will never admit that they made the picture to offend what the picture shows, and there are pictures that are obviously made to offend what they depict, such as the ones I mentioned. The blacklist option is to block what porn we dislike, not what's offensive to us.

Blitzbrony said:
Which is why I said what I said ._.'


Kielan doesn't check every picture on the site. He/She checks the pictures that are flagged, which is why there are many pictures that are offensive but not deleted. They haven't been flagged yet. That's why I made this forum: To get people to flag such pictures.
1 2>>>


Forum Index