Rule 34 - A kink/fetish that should always stay in bed

MirukoRP

07/04/23 05:10PM

A kink/fetish that should always stay in bed

Comment about that kink/fetish that should 100% stay in bed, it doesn't matter the partner, or type of relationship. What would that Kink be?

Also, check out my other forum rule34.xxx/index.php?page=forum&s=view&id=21118

Undesirable.

07/04/23 05:12PM

ooh, i’d say mostly “taboo” ones, like ageplay, cnc, fauxcest, etc…

Touhou_RP

07/04/23 05:19PM

Everyone can agree with this one

Hand-holding

Over9000GHz

07/04/23 06:56PM

Touhou_RP said:
Everyone can agree with this one

Hand-holding

Extremely risky and dangerous to mention this here. Even the dark lords cringe at such words.

Rapeseed

07/04/23 08:47PM

Every single one of them. If you're asking which of the unusual activities that turn you on shouldn't be pursued for your own pleasure outside of your private time, it's all of them.

In situations where being lewd or kinky is appropriate, you should be able to bring up any kinks which all the of people involved are comfortable with. In situations where it's not appropriate, just behave and don't make things weird.

I don't see why any kink should be better or worse than the others. What turns you on and what you like to do in your private space, without hurting anyone, is really nobody else's concern. All kinks are equal in that regard, and whether or not you should take them out of bed depends entirely on whether the people you're taking them to are comfortable with them. This goes even for the taboo ones. I hope I understood the question.

LBJofficial

07/04/23 08:56PM

Rapeseed said:
Every single one of them. If you're asking which of the unusual activities that turn you on shouldn't be pursued for your own pleasure outside of your private time, it's all of them.

In situations where being lewd or kinky is appropriate, you should be able to bring up any kinks which all the of people involved are comfortable with. In situations where it's not appropriate, just behave and don't make things weird.

I don't see why any kink should be better or worse than the others. What turns you on and what you like to do in your private space, without hurting anyone, is really nobody else's concern. All kinks are equal in that regard, and whether or not you should take them out of bed depends entirely on whether the people you're taking them to are comfortable with them. This goes even for the taboo ones. I hope I understood the question.

Agreed. Sexuality is as private as private can get, and nobody outside of your home needs to see it.

ClemenTime

07/04/23 11:30PM

There's an argument for the free expression of kink being entirely situational, given the nature of people to be averse to things based on entirely irrational feelings (just because you have a "feeling", however strong, that something disturbs you, doesn't make your objection to it any sounder; it's the context that matters, not the aversion.) The line isn't something to be drawn on whims and instinct, but where the real effects of the act lie in actuality. Someone minding their own business, just in bondage, isn't going to be any harm by simply existing in public, for example.

I'm not entitled to control the myriad methods people use to show their affection, or express themselves, so I don't find displays of kink that would never impact me or others beyond triggering some subjective repugnance or aversion to be objectionable. If I start drawing the line at subjectivity, the line would have no end.

gusfring456

07/06/23 09:46AM

ClemenTime said:
There's an argument for the free expression of kink being entirely situational, given the nature of people to be averse to things based on entirely irrational feelings (just because you have a "feeling", however strong, that something disturbs you, doesn't make your objection to it any sounder; it's the context that matters, not the aversion.) The line isn't something to be drawn on whims and instinct, but where the real effects of the act lie in actuality. Someone minding their own business, just in bondage, isn't going to be any harm by simply existing in public, for example.

I'm not entitled to control the myriad methods people use to show their affection, or express themselves, so I don't find displays of kink that would never impact me or others beyond triggering some subjective repugnance or aversion to be objectionable. If I start drawing the line at subjectivity, the line would have no end.

me when i forget social norms exist

ClemenTime

07/07/23 12:57AM

gusfring456 said:

ClemenTime said:
There's an argument for the free expression of kink being entirely situational, given the nature of people to be averse to things based on entirely irrational feelings (just because you have a "feeling", however strong, that something disturbs you, doesn't make your objection to it any sounder; it's the context that matters, not the aversion.) The line isn't something to be drawn on whims and instinct, but where the real effects of the act lie in actuality. Someone minding their own business, just in bondage, isn't going to be any harm by simply existing in public, for example.

I'm not entitled to control the myriad methods people use to show their affection, or express themselves, so I don't find displays of kink that would never impact me or others beyond triggering some subjective repugnance or aversion to be objectionable. If I start drawing the line at subjectivity, the line would have no end.

me when i forget social norms exist

Social norms are covered with things like the "context" part. Obviously it's usually another subjective term though :x Some cultures eroticize bare chests or ankles or shoulders, others won't, etc.

baddy1000

07/07/23 01:03AM

Bed Sex, no?

Spurtyn

07/07/23 01:11AM

AgePlay needs to be yeeted into this category. Personally, idfw it. But I'm sure at least one of us on this site does lmao

gusfring456

07/07/23 01:21AM

ClemenTime said:

gusfring456 said:

ClemenTime said:
There's an argument for the free expression of kink being entirely situational, given the nature of people to be averse to things based on entirely irrational feelings (just because you have a "feeling", however strong, that something disturbs you, doesn't make your objection to it any sounder; it's the context that matters, not the aversion.) The line isn't something to be drawn on whims and instinct, but where the real effects of the act lie in actuality. Someone minding their own business, just in bondage, isn't going to be any harm by simply existing in public, for example.

I'm not entitled to control the myriad methods people use to show their affection, or express themselves, so I don't find displays of kink that would never impact me or others beyond triggering some subjective repugnance or aversion to be objectionable. If I start drawing the line at subjectivity, the line would have no end.

me when i forget social norms exist

Social norms are covered with things like the "context" part. Obviously it's usually another subjective term though :x Some cultures eroticize bare chests or ankles or shoulders, others won't, etc.

Fair enough i guess