Someone is flagging posts purely for having scat, and someone is deleting these posts as well. It really needs to be specified whether scat is allowed or not because it's rather ridiculous.

Do those posts show porn as well as scat or just scat? The "just scat" ones would be against the rules and should be deleted, such as post #9838846 which was uploaded by you.

i.postimg.cc/x8cjgNpc/disgusted1.jpg

What a shitty situation.

^
IM SOBBIN-

Yes, the posts are those of nude (fictional) woman defecating, not pics of just feces

If this is considered against the tos, which is news to me and I wasn't able to find anything on the tos about that, then you have a LOT more stuff to remove and may as well ban scat entirely.

Well, they might be removed if they're shit quality.

All that time spent uploading and tagging just went down the drain!

I have a feeling this problem won't be a piece'a piss.

I would understand that and really wish they would start deleting low quality posts. No, the reason the posts I'm talking about were deleted, and not all of them were ones I posted, were because of "no hardcore scat" which obviously isn't true, nor was an example of hardcore. Others were just flagged for scat, no other explanation. Whoever is doing it just needs to learn to blacklist.

You can find information that excessive/hardcore scat violates the rules in the Elaborated Terms of Service, which can be found here:

rule34.xxx/index.php?page=forum&s=view&id=4163

Quit whining. If other posts that didn't meet the level of quality haven't been banned, it's not be ause anyone made an exception. It's because the moderation team is tiny and the site gets thousands of image submissions every day. If you think those other images should be removed, too, then flag them.

ba-dum tsss

I've flagged images months ago for actually being low quality that are still up.

That is actually helpful, that said, the rule seems to hardly be upheld.

shit happens I guess