Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? nasa 135
Character
- ? orbit 18
Artist
- ? guodzilla 86
General
- ? aeromorph 1144
- ? big breasts 1809941
- ? living machine 4826
- ? moon 22558
- ? shipmorph 51
- ? spacecraft 2094
- ? spaceship 1104
Cum on this
-
You can cum every 24 hours.
Explanation here and top list here.
Statistics
- Id: 8569239
-
Posted: 2023-09-03 22:41:11
by Guodzilla - Size: 4080x3060
- Source: www.deviantart.com/guodzilla/art/gallery
- Rating: Explicit
- Score: 1 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
1
Posted on 2023-09-03 22:41:44 Score: 4 (vote Up) ( Report comment )
Posted on 2023-10-02 05:30:52 Score: 1 (vote Up) ( Report comment )
Posted on 2023-12-06 21:24:38 Score: 1 (vote Up) ( Report comment )
orion and esm make sense, but the icps doesnt. i'm fairly sure, correct me if im wrong, that the icps doesnt do the circularization burn. artemis 1 and 2 will be purely lunar flybys, artemis 1 uncrewed and artemis 2 crewed
icps does do the tli burn after a full orbit of orion, but it separates afterwards. for artemis 3 and beyond, which are crewed landings, orion itself with the AJ10 engine from the space shuttle OMS does the circularization burn into a near-rectilinear halo orbit to dock with the lander directly.
crew transfers into the lander, they separate, lander descends into low lunar orbit and then descends into touchdown, soon after it ascends back up into an nrho orbit to dock with orion, where the crew transfers back into orion and separates from the lander, where orion does the burn back to earth, and then it returns.
god, i hope i never have to do this again.