Anonymous >> #7004984
Posted on 2021-11-10 02:09:27 Score: 0 (vote Up) ( Report comment )

This is clearly not circumcised so why is it tagged as such??

thembig >> #7005524
Posted on 2021-11-10 03:20:30 Score: 1 (vote Up) ( Report comment )

>>7004984 I don't know what you're talking about. There's no foreskin in this picture

Lothar_The_Elder >> #7016717
Posted on 2021-11-11 09:06:19 Score: 2 (vote Up) ( Report comment )

>>7005524 Sure there is. It's the bunched-up bit that's retracted behind the glans (head) as it commonly but not always does when uncircumcised guys become erect. Further proof it isn't circumcised is the lack of a circumcision scar which would be clearly visible at this distance and angle.

thembig >> #7017073
Posted on 2021-11-11 10:17:58 Score: 0 (vote Up) ( Report comment )

>>7005524 I know what retracted foreskin looks like and what you are referring to in this drawing is a vein. Remert has drawn practically hundreds of dicks that don't have visible foreskin or circumcision scars. It's a 10-foot-tall cock. It doesn't have to be realistic. If you are so inclined, then remove the tag yourself

Anonymous >> #7323203
Posted on 2021-12-13 12:03:01 Score: 0 (vote Up) ( Report comment )

when you eat 3 vitamin gummies instead of 2