Anonymous >> #311601
Posted on 2014-09-04 12:07:29 Score: 1 (vote Up) ( Report comment )

Damn them blurring the good stuff out, that looks like it is so good.

Anonymous >> #311653
Posted on 2014-09-04 17:26:24 Score: -7 (vote Up) ( Report comment )

You are joking, right? The blurring is so slight you can still see the division of her fingers in it. There's nothing there you CAN'T see through the blurring. Is there some reason you must see the folds of her labia with perfect clarity for the picture to be sufficiently hot? Or do you need crisp lines on the orc junk to be 'the good stuff'? I mean, come on. Some censoring is tragic because you can't see what's going on, but in cases like this you can just squint and not even be able to tell it's censored at all.

abs >> #311659
Posted on 2014-09-04 18:17:18 Score: 2 (vote Up) ( Report comment )

yeah at least theres not black censor bars concealing all the good stuff.

Anonymous >> #311895
Posted on 2014-09-05 05:52:31 Score: 7 (vote Up) ( Report comment )

Regardless of the quality of the censorship, I'd still love to see the uncensored art; It's really doing an injustice to the artist(s) to have to "ruin" the detailed work due to distribution law. I'm kind of hoping one day soon some of these artists move or have significant change in local law to actually release more unadulterated artworks. (Some people enjoy the art just as much as the depicted acts of sexual relations)

abs >> #311897
Posted on 2014-09-05 05:54:32 Score: 1 (vote Up) ( Report comment )

i agree with anon.