Rule63MePlease said:
And? People like attractive adult female humans, that's normal. Futa is not normal. There is a ton of things done with attractive adult female humans that is creative. But people seem to think a futa is creative just because it's a futa. It's not. :|
Gloom said:
You exposed your hypocrisy, just as planned.
Rule63MePlease said:
How many futas do you know in real life? I'm pretty sure it's not normal. :|
You missed the point. You basically said that artists who only draw females are creative while artists who only draw futanari are not creative. That is a double standard and only hypocrites uphold double standards. The fact that females are normal and futanari are not is irrelevant. In fiction, anything goes. Normality and creativity are not proportional to each other. Any work of fiction can potentially be either, neither or both.
You've exposed this same hypocrisy in the past, stating that furry artists and MLP artists are uncreative simply because they only draw those things. Specialization in one specific type of content is not a lack of creativity, regardless of what content that artist has chosen to specialize in. By making you attempt to explain why this double standard is OK, I've proven that you are biased and a hypocrite, and all it took was one simple question that I already knew your answer to.
I am now going to do something I haven't done yet: Make a bold statement about you. You believe any artists who creates something you don't like is uncreative while any artists who creates something you do like is creative. That is your bias, your double standard, that you use in many of your arguments. Unfortunately, it will never work against me.
Rule63MePlease said:
Yeah futas have no purpose so why would it matter if 8 other genders had no purpose? I'm just saying it would be something different. I never said they needed a purpose.
Gloom said:
Futanari can perform the roles of both males and females and can be used as a substitute for either if needed so they would serve a functional purpose, whereas an 8-gender race would either require all 8 members for reproduction which would be too complex and impractical to work or some of those genders would be redundant and have no reason to exist beyond offering insignificant variety.
Rule63MePlease said:
Futas can't reproduce. And you don't know what roles 8 other genders could fill because you don't know what they are. So you can't say for sure they would be completely pointless or redundant. No one has anyone way of knowing. I'm sure they would most likely not be attractive, but they would be very different, and most likely not just a 2 in 1 deal like a futa.
I didn't say for sure they would be completely pointless or redundant. I stated it would be possible that they could be pointless or redundant. There's a difference.
The possibility of futanari reproduction depends on the artist who drew them. You can't use real life as an indication of fictional reproduction for something that does not exist in real life and I already explained 2 pages ago why it can't exist. You are likely referring to real intersex people who are neither male or female and therefore lack reproductive ability. Again, in fiction, anything goes.