cm1993
01/04/15 10:15PM
Photoshop
I am wondering if there are some people who know how to photoshop nudes?
HumptyDumpty
01/04/15 10:17PM
No, and photoshopped nudes and similar bad edits are not allowed here anyway.
cm1993
01/04/15 10:22PM
HumptyDumpty said:
No, and photoshopped nudes and similar bad edits are not allowed here anyway.



ok my bad.
Cane751
01/15/15 09:56AM
HumptyDumpty said:
No, and photoshopped nudes and similar bad edits are not allowed here anyway.


And here's where you're wrong. Actual good edits (cartoons) are allowed. Some mods just go delete crazy regardless of quality. Alt images by the original artist will sometimes (most likely) get deleted because mods instantly think their edits by other people. For example: A futa and a strap-on version of an image.

Good edits - Yes
Bad edits - No

Anyway, I prefer a different image site over this one.
It can get really stupid here sometimes.

It's nonsense.
Gloom
01/15/15 10:06AM
Terms of Service (forum #4163):
12. Edits of original photographs is against copyright law.

Edits of original art works by artists is not permitted, however good edits of popular media, cartoons etc is permissible, since this rule exists to protect content makers who would withdraw their artwork should it be altered, to date no popular media company has asked us to remove edits of it's shows.

Edits or shoops, images that have been altered from the original or doctored will be removed, this includes celebrity fakes unless they are of very good quality.


In other words...
Cane751 said:
Actual good edits (cartoons) are allowed.

Good edits - Yes
Bad edits - No
...is wrong.

You can still teach cm1993 how to photoshop if you want, just remember that we won't allow them to be posted here.
Cane751
01/15/15 10:25AM
^Edited my post. So I'm gonna say you only saw the old version of my post.

Anyway, if you guys have a stick up your you-know-what about edits. Why is my post still here? rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=1172033 (this is actually an edit of an edit).

This is the original: sigurdhosenfeld.deviantar...-Peachy-Present-148999114

Sigurd never posted a nude base of that image, ever. I told a mod about this before. I was told that it was ok, it's not a harmful edit.
Gloom
01/15/15 10:28AM
Cane751 said:
^Edited my post. So I'm gonna say you only saw the old version of my post.

Anyway, if you guys have a stick up your you-know-what about edits. Why is my post still here? rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=1172033 (this is actually an edit of an edit).

This is the original: sigurdhosenfeld.deviantar...-Peachy-Present-148999114

Sigurd never posted a nude base of that image, ever. I told a mod about this before. I was told that it was ok, it's not a harmful edit.

We have over 1500000 images. Going through every one of them to eliminate the edits takes a lot of time.

Thank you for finding that one for us. It is deleted now.
Cane751
01/15/15 10:44AM
It really wasn't a bad edit at all. Plus, I just told you that a mod said it wasn't a harmful edit. So why delete it now? Even Sigurd himself knows about my uploaded edit, and has no problem with it. He has known about that Peach edit for YEARS.

Restore.
Gloom
01/15/15 10:54AM
Only Admin can do that. Besides, the outline in some sections (eg. upper right arm) were rough and discolored. I noticed it almost straight away.

Why delete now? Because I didn't know about it before.

Edit: I'm surprised the original isn't here. Many of the others are.
Cane751
01/15/15 11:26AM
Gloom said:
Only Admin can do that. Besides, the outline in some sections (eg. upper right arm) were rough and discolored. I noticed it almost straight away.

Why delete now? Because I didn't know about it before.

Edit: I'm surprised the original isn't here. Many of the others are.


The original was uploaded here at some point (not by me), but it got deleted. Reason: not porn. Most likely because in the original she's covered up in ribbons (not showing frontal nudity... nipples).
Gloom
01/15/15 11:29AM
Cane751 said:
The original was uploaded here at some point (not by me), but it got deleted. Reason: not porn. Most likely because in the original she's covered up in ribbons (not showing frontal nudity... nipples).

I guess that makes sense... still a great image, though.
Cane751
01/15/15 11:32AM
Gloom said:
I guess that makes sense... still a great image, though.


Edit: Oh wait, you must mean the original.
Gloom
01/15/15 11:41AM
Cane751 said:
Thx.

Edit: Oh wait, you must mean the original. XD

Yeah, I meant the original. Remember: A good edit is one where you can't tell what has been edited. I spotted your edits within seconds, even without the original to compare it to.
Cane751
01/15/15 12:46PM
Gloom said:
Yeah, I meant the original. Remember: A good edit is one where you can't tell what has been edited. I spotted your edits within seconds, even without the original to compare it to.


Okay, now you're just trying to nitpick. People to this day still think that nude version is by Sigurd, and other mods were okay with it being posted here. It was on the first page for a long time. A few images were deleted (mostly smaller duplicate images), but my upload wasn't deleted.

*getting tired, needs sleep. I'll be back. logging out*
Kielan
01/15/15 04:49PM
If you want to edit someone elses work you need permission from the creator, you need to give a link to that permission on the image you upload in the comments, or at least send it to me so I can give my ok on the comments section, so we know you have permission, your edit also has to be of good quality.

If you fail to demonstrate you have permission to edit an artists original work, expect it to be deleted sooner or later.

As for non porn getting removed, it depends entirely who removes it, we try to have the same standard but it is impossible to be 100% the same.
1


Forum Index