MOTHER OF POSTS
Its so large I can't load it, please describe it for me.
Just a Twilight Sparkle taking it up from the ass
Oh...ok.
That's only a measly 1850x3390. If you want a big image, check this: post #1282593
Hory sheet!! My phone doesn't load it xD
My phone exploded
Mine froze up, I thought I'd get the blue screen of death for sure.
p.s. I have a Win-Phone (windows phone)
p.s. I have a Win-Phone (windows phone)
kailyn said:
Mine froze up, I thought I'd get the blue screen of death for sure.
p.s. I have a Win-Phone (windows phone)
Mine froze up, I thought I'd get the blue screen of death for sure.
p.s. I have a Win-Phone (windows phone)
loljk mine just don't load it (I have a Samsung Next Turbo)
It makes me wonder why some artists make the images that big. Unless they plan to put it on a billboard I'd say anything above, say, 2400x2400 is unnecessary. Plus most monitors and no phone can display an image that big in full without shrinking it first.
Gloom said:
It makes me wonder why some artists make the images that big. Unless they plan to put it on a billboard I'd say anything above, say, 2400x2400 is unnecessary. Plus most monitors and no phone can display an image that big in full without shrinking it first.
It makes me wonder why some artists make the images that big. Unless they plan to put it on a billboard I'd say anything above, say, 2400x2400 is unnecessary. Plus most monitors and no phone can display an image that big in full without shrinking it first.
They make it bigger because it's easier to apply detail. I rarely do this though because it's more expensive, plus I like a challenge.
That makes sense, but you have to admit: That image I found is going a bit overboard in that regard. Since it's not aiming for photorealism the resolution doesn't need to be that high.
Very true. Hmmm... Due to the lack of any other explanation, I have concluded that the artist simply thought "bigger is better".
