NutclearOne
02/22/24 04:39PM
Lesbian with Male tagged images
Tag says 1033 but only 45 images show up. I already have no filters and threshold -9999 and I know images get soft deleted. Just wondering 2 things: Is there anything else I can do that may show more images/show soft-deleted images, and is there a better tag for such images (there ought to be more than just Hazbin art of this tag).
Shaded_Cube
02/22/24 04:41PM
Ghost tags, it's an error.
And that tag isn't suppose to be added anyways. I've had multiple damn arguments over it.
PlaceHoldPic
03/06/24 06:29AM
When you go into the tag definition. It says it has been banned for excessive misapplication or misuse. I'm assuming some mod was not into vanilla gameplay.
Totobro
03/06/24 06:48AM
PlaceHoldPic said:
When you go into the tag definition. It says it has been banned for excessive misapplication or misuse. I'm assuming some mod was not into vanilla gameplay.


Oh is that what the wiki's for? Well there goes the rest of my evening
ares95
03/06/24 07:31PM
Orientation play is the tag you're looking for
BigDadEnergy
03/07/24 06:33PM
Shaded_Cube said:
Ghost tags, it's an error.
And that tag isn't suppose to be added anyways. I've had multiple damn arguments over it.


Can someone please provide the missing context? I was wondering about this tag myself. It would seem that a banned tag would be unable to use, but I tried using it a few days ago, and it seemed to work. It's worked over forty other times. What were these arguments?

ares95 said:
Orientation play is the tag you're looking for


Thank you, I did not know that and never would have guessed. Also wow, that is way, way more vague.
doltscanttag
03/07/24 06:39PM
BigDadEnergy said:
Can someone please provide the missing context? I was wondering about this tag myself. It would seem that a banned tag would be unable to use, but I tried using it a few days ago, and it seemed to work. It's worked over forty other times. What were these arguments?

Tagging policy is "Tag what you see, not what you know". You can't see a character's sexual orientation so you're not supposed to tag it.
Lothar_The_Elder
03/07/24 06:50PM
doltscanttag said:
BigDadEnergy said:
Can someone please provide the missing context? I was wondering about this tag myself. It would seem that a banned tag would be unable to use, but I tried using it a few days ago, and it seemed to work. It's worked over forty other times. What were these arguments?

Tagging policy is "Tag what you see, not what you know". You can't see a character's sexual orientation so you're not supposed to tag it.

Yep, you'd be tagging the sexual activity, not the character's sexual orientation, based on what the character is doing within the image. For example, gal fooling around with another gal = lesbian/yuri in that image. Gal fooling around with a guy = hetero/straight in that image. Since the rule is "Tag what you see, not what you know", lore or history relating to the characters is completely irrelevant and the only thing that matters from a tagging perspective is what is depicted in each image.
Shaded_Cube
03/07/24 07:04PM
Lothar_The_Elder said:
doltscanttag said:
BigDadEnergy said:
Can someone please provide the missing context? I was wondering about this tag myself. It would seem that a banned tag would be unable to use, but I tried using it a few days ago, and it seemed to work. It's worked over forty other times. What were these arguments?

Tagging policy is "Tag what you see, not what you know". You can't see a character's sexual orientation so you're not supposed to tag it.

Yep, you'd be tagging the sexual activity, not the character's sexual orientation, based on what the character is doing within the image. For example, gal fooling around with another gal = lesbian/yuri in that image. Gal fooling around with a guy = hetero/straight in that image. Since the rule is "Tag what you see, not what you know", lore or history relating to the characters is completely irrelevant and the only thing that matters from a tagging perspective is what is depicted in each image.

There was plenty of cases where people were adding on characters there weren't canonically lesbians anyways.
1


Reply | Forum Index